# Summary

The calculation of the wetted area and volume of a vertical vessel is required for engineering tasks such fire studies and the determination of level alarms and control set points. However the calculation of these parameters is complicated by the geometry of the vessel, particularly the heads. This article details formulae for calculating the wetted area and volume of these vessels for various types of curved ends including: hemispherical, torispherical, semi-ellipsoidal and bumped ends.

# Definitions

: | Wetted Area | |

: | Inside Diameter of Vessel | |

: | Outside Diameter of Vessel | |

: | Liquid level above vessel bottom | |

: | Length of vessel, tan-line to tan-line | |

: | Straight Flange | |

: | Inside Vessel Radius | |

: | Inside crown radius | |

: | Inside knuckle radius | |

: | Vessel Wall Thickness | |

: | Partially Filled Liquid Volume | |

: | Total Volume of head or vessel | |

: | Inside Dish Depth | |

: | Eccentricity of elliptical heads |

# Introduction

The calculation of the liquid volume or wetted area of a partially filled vertical vessel is best performed in parts, by calculating the value for the cylindrical section of the vessel and the heads of the vessel and then adding the areas or volumes together. Below we present the wetted area and partially filled volume for each type of head and the cylindrical section.

The partially filled volume is primarily used for the calculation of tank filling times and the setting of control set points, alarm levels and system trip points.

The wetted area is the area of contact between the liquid and the wall of the tank. This is primary used in fire studies of process and storage vessels to determine the emergency venting capacity required to protect the vessel. Unlike horizontal vessels, it is not often required to know the surface area of a partially filled vertical vessel's head and in this article we present formulae for completely filled heads only.

The volume and wetted area of partially filled horizontal vessels is covered separately.

# Hemispherical Heads - Vertical Vessel

Hemispherical heads have a depth which is half their diameter. They have the highest design pressures out of all the head types and as such are typically the most expensive head type. The formula for calculating the wetted area and volume are presented as follows.

## Wetted Area

## Volume

For the bottom head:

For the top head:

Where is defined as the free space between the liquid surface and the top of the head.

# Semi-ellipsoidal or Elliptical Heads - Vertical Vessel

The semi-ellipsoidal heads are shallower than the hemispherical heads and deeper than the torispherical heads and therefore have design pressures and expense lying between these two designs.

The most common variant of semi-ellipsoidal head is the 2:1 elliptical head which has a depth equal to 1/4 of the vessel diameter. The formula for calculating the wetted area and volume for the 2:1 semi-elliptical head are presented as follows.

## Wetted Area

For a 2:1 semi-ellipsoidal head is equal to 0.866. The wetted area calculated using this method does not include the straight flange of the head. The length of the straight flange must be included in the calculation of the wetted area of the cylindrical section.

## Volume

For the bottom head:

For the top head:

Where,

for ASME 2:1 Elliptical heads:

for DIN 28013 Semi ellipsoidal heads:

The volume calculated does not include the straight flange of the head, only the curved section. The straight flange length must be included in the calculation of the volume of the cylindrical section.

# Torispherical Heads - Vertical Vessel

Torispherical heads are the most economical and therefore is the most common head type used for process vessels. Torispherical heads are shallower and typically have lower design pressures than semi-elliptical heads. The formula for the calculation of the wetted area and volume of a partially filled torispherical head is presented as follows.

## Wetted Area

We can approximate the partially filled surface area of the torispherical head using the formula for elliptical heads. This approximation will over estimate the surface area because a torispherical head is flatter than a ellipsoidal head. This assumption is conservative for pool fire relieving calculations.

The wetted area calculated using this method does not include the straight flange of the head. The length of the straight flange must be included in the calculation of the wetted area of the cylindrical section.

## Volume

For the bottom head:

For the top head:

Where,

for ASME Torispherical heads:

for DIN 28011 Torispherical heads:

The volume calculated does not include the straight flange of the head, only the curved section. The straight flange length must be included in the calculation of the volume of the cylindrical section.

# Bumped Heads - Vertical Vessel

Bumped heads have the lowest cost but also the lowest design pressures, unlike torispherical or ellipsoidal heads they have no knuckle. They are typically used in atmospheric tanks, such as horizontal liquid fuel storage tanks or road tankers. Due to the low strength and poor draining qualities of this head type it is rarely used for vertical vessels.

Here we present formulae for calculated the wetted area and volume for an arbitrary liquid level height in a single Bumped head.

## Wetted Area

## Volume

For the bottom head:

For the top head:

Where is defined as the free space between the liquid surface and the top of the head.

# Cylindrical Section - Vertical Vessel

Here we present formulae for calculated the wetted area and volume for an arbitrary liquid level height in the cylindrical section of a vertical drum.

## Wetted Area

## Volume

Where the vessel has torispherical or ellipsoidal heads the straight flange length of the head should be included in the cylindrical section length when calculating the volume or surface area.

# References

- B Wiencke, 2009,
*Computing the partial volume of pressure vessels* - R Doane, 2007,
*Accurate Wetted Areas for Partially Filled Vessels* - E Ludwing, 1997,
*Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petrochemical Plants (Volume 2)*